The Failures of the Israel Boycotters

It seems to be an up and down time in the world of the Israel boycott-ers right now. A recent BDS success was the decision by the Co-Op to boycott goods from Israel (more on that later), but in the US the Presbyterian Church (USA) declined to pass a divestment vote against Caterpillar and others in their General Assembly. Sadly, the BDS-o-meter comes back up again with this week’s decision by the Synod of the Church of England to recognise the hugely unbalanced work of the EAPPI (Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel) in presenting the situation in Israel and the Territories from an almost completely Palestinian perspective to British churches.

In general terms the various campaigns by British BDS groups have been noisy and sometimes messy, but in practical terms of effective boycotts they have been a complete failure (most recently at Shakespeare’s Globe, where they failed to stop Israel’s national theatre company performing).  It is easy for Israel-supporters and indeed anyone who wants to see the Middle East reported in a fair and balanced way to be discouraged by the claims of the various NGOs and charities advocating boycotts, but the reality of the economic dynamic between Britain and Israel should lift our spirits and encourage us. Read more of this post

The Jerusalem Light Railway – so bad for Arabs!

Shortly after the Oslo Accords were signed, in the mid-1990s, the Israeli Government announced plans to build a light rail system (trams to you and me) that would unite East and West Jerusalem communities, ease the city’s notorious traffic problems, improve economic development and improve transport services to both Jewish and Arab communities in the East of the city. This would be particularly helpful to East Jerusalem Arabs, since a high proportion of them work in West Jerusalem but live in the Eastern areas of the city. It would also improve the infrastructure for Jewish suburbs such as Pisgat Ze’ev in the far North (and East) of the Jerusalem Municipality.

There are many groups internationally who are opposed to Israel’s reoccupation of her own ancient capital and determined that East Jerusalem should instead be the capital of a future Palestinian state. Throughout the planning and construction stages, these groups campaigned aggressively against the light railway (LRT), maintaining that it was designed to…

* Service Jewish “illegal settlements”, such as Pisgat Ze’ev
* Solidify Israel’s “illegal occupation” of East Jerusalem and make it irreversible
* Provide improved transport for Jews in East Jerusalem but not for Arabs
* Support Israeli “colonisation” of Palestinian land

Furthermore, the opposition groups claimed that the LRT would be bad for East Jerusalem’s Arabs, that the tram stops were inaccessible to Arab areas and that these Arab communities were themselves against the project and would not use the trams once they were running. Read more of this post

Why the Palestinians Need Israel to survive.

Our last post mentioned a UNESCO report to the European donors’ conference in Amsterdam last month. This group, known commonly as the “Ad Hoc Liaison Committee (AHLC), also received a report form the Government of Israel on the measures taken by Israel to support the Palestinian economy and to encourage enterprise and growth in the PA-controlled areas.

The UNESCO report highlighted that financial issues are putting the Palestinian efforts to create a state at “increased risk“. The Israeli report echoes this, pointing out that, not only has the PA suffered from the effects of the worldwide financial turmoil, but also that it only enjoys limited support from the Arab states. A brief extract from the report’s executive summary, however, gives an indication of how much support Israel is pouring into the PA in one form or another… Read more of this post

Eat your heart out, Mr Israel Boycotter!

A boycotter at a BDS rallyLondon is said to be one of the global hubs of the international delegitimisation and BDS (Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions) campaigns, but right now the British Israel-Boycotters face multiple blows to their efforts.

The first blow comes from statistics. This year, bilateral trade with Israel reached £3.75bn, a huge 34% increase on last year! The Jewish Chronicle this week  reports these figures gleefully as “…putting firmly in its place the campaign for a boycott of Israeli goods.” The article, headed “Boycott, What Boycott?” goes on to say that Israel is now Britain’s largest trading partner in the Near East and Africa. Matthew Gould, Britain’s ambassador to Israel, said, “There is a lot of noise around boycotts but these figures show that it is just noise, and the trade relationship speaks for itself.”

The second blow this week came on Wednesday in London, with the first meeting of the “UK-Israel Tech Council”. Co-chaired by Universities Minister David Willetts and Israel’s Chief Scientist Avi Hasson, and including top level business leaders from both countries, the Council is linked to a new initiative at the British embassy in Israel, the “UK-Israel Technologies Hub”. The two groups between them are creating a strategy for much closer UK-Israel tech links; the world’s “start-up nation” and the UK’s solid academic and manufacturing history – a winning combination. Read more of this post

One of Israel’s Most Successful Exports – hosepipes with holes in!

Hosepipes for African Agriculture

Making every drop count in Africa
(Source: Ministry of foreign Affairs, Israel)

Since its founding in 1948, Israel has had a thirst to grow crops in the desert. It wasn’t just a technological challenge, but a matter of survival. Today, Israel offers some of the world’s hottest technologies in desalination, water reclamation and crop irrigation.

To help Africans in a similar situation, the Israeli Foreign Ministry’s MASHAV (Agency for International Development Cooperation) has developed Tipa (“drop”) to transfer Israeli drip-irrigation water technology to remote areas in Senegal, where basic amenities, even electricity, are lacking.

Modern drip irrigation, the most efficient method of watering crops, evolved from an ancient method where clay pots were filled with water and buried underground so that the water would gradually seep out of the pots and into the crops. Later the same effect was achieved by using perforated pipes or hoses, applying water slowly and directly to plants’ roots and allowing it to soak into the soil before it can evaporate or run off. In the 1960s, farmers in many countries began using an Israeli-pioneered plastic emitter that revolutionised and perfected the method for maximum growth with minimum water.

It’s been a boon for Senegal, situated in the drought-prone Sahelian region, where rainfall is irregular and the soil poor in nutrients. About 75 percent of the working population is engaged in farming, and a majority of these farms are dependent on rain.

The Israeli solution, based on easy-to-install drip irrigation systems and an economic model, is becoming so wildly successful that towns and villages beyond the perimeters of the Israeli projects are copying them, says Ilan Fluss, Director of MASHAV’S Planning and External Relations Department. “Irrigation is one of the main pillars of the activities of MASHAV,” says Fluss. The Senegal model was implemented seven years ago, introduced first by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev at a sustainable development summit in Johannesburg in 2002. Two years later, the proj! ect was up and running.

“Today a lot of them are growing maize and vegetables but we have introduced to them high-value crops, and what can happen when the [small farms] are organised into communities so they are working together. They plant together and try to work in a coordinated way to solve issues of [food] security, and obviously they can sell into the markets what they are producing.”

The Israeli solution is complete, scalable and replicable, even without direct Israeli input – and that’s the beauty of it. Once the idea is fully understood, the Senegalese can develop it themselves. “We are bringing a solution to small farmers without the abilities to invest in modern agriculture,” says Fluss. “But our solutions are loaded with technology. We bring them simple solutions that are sustainable and which can be applied in a rural setting.”

Some farmers already have been able to triple their income, and have found the system reduces the amount of time needed in the fields for weeding.

Israel also gives the Senegalese capacity-building support, Fluss says. “We are working with them to make sure they produce [their crops] in the right way, overseeing their production efforts to help make sure that the farmers will be productive and independent after a couple of years.”

The Senegalese government has turned the Israeli model into a national programme. A new trilateral partnership established between the governments of Israel, Italy and Senegal will install some 500 hectares of Tipa to directly benefit 10,000 people in rural Senegal.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 112 other followers

%d bloggers like this: